Our services operate a full range of state-of-the-art computerized inspection tools that utilize ultrasound technology, delivering unparalleled accuracy and resolution. All data files are stored on digital media, allowing for data review by clients or third parties.
We can provide test solutions to whatever diameter you would require:
The use of automated ultrasonic testing (AUT), Zonal Discrimination technique, for inspecting pipeline girth welds during construction has significantly increased worldwide since the technology first became available in the 1980s. This growth is attributed to substantial advancements in ultrasonic technology and the safety and environmental benefits of avoiding ionizing radiation used in radiography.
To maximize the economic benefits of this new technology, it is essential to leverage ultrasonic testing's capability to accurately determine the size of any detected defects. Small defects can be left unrepaired if they are deemed safe through a fitness-for-purpose analysis. For this approach to be reliable, the accuracy of defect size estimation must be established, and the interaction between sizing errors and defect acceptance limits must be considered.
Radiographic Testing (RT) provides a 2-dimensional image of the weld, allowing interpretation only for length sizing. This method requires assuming all flaws are through-wall. In contrast, Automated Ultrasonic Testing (AUT) offers the advantage of vertical sizing, enabling the determination of the through-wall height of flaws. This capability reduces the number of unnecessary repairs.
With Automated Ultrasonic Testing (AUT), the thickness or diameter of a pipeline does not affect the scanning time. The scanning duration remains consistent regardless of these factors.
Time-of-Flight Diffraction (TOFD) enables several cost savings and significantly improves EPC competitiveness compared to Radiographic Testing (RT):
At the same quality level, the inspection speed with Time-of-Flight Diffraction (TOFD) will be increased by a factor of three compared to conventional ultrasonic testing (UT). The productivity gain is even higher when TOFD is compared to radiography (RT), with more than a 40% increase expected. RT is generally performed at night to avoid interrupting welding during the day. Additionally, the delay in obtaining inspection results will be drastically reduced compared to radiographic testing, as there is no need for film processing or drying before evaluation.
Considering inspection costs, using TOFD can save about 10% of the total manufacturing cost of high-security pressure equipment, clearly demonstrating that the TOFD method significantly improves EPC competitiveness.